“Imperial palace” 19 Had stolen a collection worth 410000 yuan

& have spent Sunday morning, the reporter learned that, & other; 5 & middot; 8 & throughout; Exhibits theft will be next Monday at the Beijing second intermediate people’s court of first instance verdict. On February 17th, has been the media dubbed & other; The imperial palace bandit & throughout; The Shi Baikui on trial, and deny premeditated theft in court.

last year May 8 in the evening, Shi Baikui infiltrated the Palace Museum, hospital, I have to Hong Kong on 9 exhibits on display in the museum. In the process of escape, he will be stolen by 5 exhibits lost or discarded, then fled the scene. The next day because of the fence, and their four exhibits discarded.

according to article two hundred and sixty-four of the criminal law in our country, theft of public or private property, relatively large or multiple theft, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance, and concurrently or independently be sentenced to a fine; Large or there are other serious circumstances, sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years but not more than ten years, fine; The amount is especially huge, or there are other especially serious circumstances, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment, fine or confiscation of property; Theft amount is especially huge or theft and precious cultural relics, if the circumstances are serious, be sentenced to life imprisonment or death, and concurrently to confiscation of property. It can be seen that theft is mainly according to the criterions for the conviction of the amount of theft. But Shi Baikui complaint does not give the value of the stolen items. Prosecutors only identified the stolen 9 exhibits the amount of cover a total of 410000 yuan, including Shi Baikui abandonment and lost three exhibits insurance amount is 150000 yuan. And the amount of cover is only a reference, not directly determine the amount of theft. Thefts were detected after it is reported, the Palace Museum, the judicial organs around quite a lot of work on the value appraisal of stolen exhibits, but it was not until the prosecution, also failed to amount be definitive for theft.